![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jadedmusingsSometimes, being in #returners can creep me the fuck out.
[17:46:36] <Creepster> I recently went to Uni. Lots of promiscuous girls.
[17:46:36] <Bystander> Rock on.
[17:46:36] <Creepster> With large breasts and low tops.
[17:46:36] <Asshat> Ah, I remember my Uni days
[17:46:42] <Asshat> Sadly, does not appear to extend to grad school, or at least I can't easily hit on the undergrads <_<
[17:46:42] <Bystander> Technically, I'm still in them. But it's community college, so not too great on those choices.
[17:46:42] <Bystander2> what did morgan say about seeming stereotypical?
[17:46:42] <Creepster> If I go back to Uni I have the problem that I'll be too old to sleep with my peers :/
[17:46:42] <Creepster> Which totally sucks.
Where, oh where do I begin? First is the presumption that if a woman (because if they're old enough to be in college/university, they're adults) has large breasts and wears low-cut tops, she's promiscuous. It couldn't just be that she happens to like wearing low-cut tops or that, as I know all too well as a woman with larger-than-average breasts, tops look differently on you than they do on the rack/on a woman with a different body. No, she is a dirty whore who jumps on any penis within her immediate vicinity(except the penis of the man posting).
Secondly is the person in a position of authority over undergrads (a teaching assistant) complaining that he can't hit on his students. Yes, because those sorts of relationships don't have the potential for abuse.
Thirdly we have the complaint that he can't have sex with his fellow students because he's now older, which is somewhat reasonable I guess, though most students in college are considered adults legally. However, I find it troubling he's more concerned about how it would look to sleep with his "peers," rather than focusing on his education.
All of this under a minute of time. And the sad thing is I could post even more.
[17:46:36] <Creepster> I recently went to Uni. Lots of promiscuous girls.
[17:46:36] <Bystander> Rock on.
[17:46:36] <Creepster> With large breasts and low tops.
[17:46:36] <Asshat> Ah, I remember my Uni days
[17:46:42] <Asshat> Sadly, does not appear to extend to grad school, or at least I can't easily hit on the undergrads <_<
[17:46:42] <Bystander> Technically, I'm still in them. But it's community college, so not too great on those choices.
[17:46:42] <Bystander2> what did morgan say about seeming stereotypical?
[17:46:42] <Creepster> If I go back to Uni I have the problem that I'll be too old to sleep with my peers :/
[17:46:42] <Creepster> Which totally sucks.
Where, oh where do I begin? First is the presumption that if a woman (because if they're old enough to be in college/university, they're adults) has large breasts and wears low-cut tops, she's promiscuous. It couldn't just be that she happens to like wearing low-cut tops or that, as I know all too well as a woman with larger-than-average breasts, tops look differently on you than they do on the rack/on a woman with a different body. No, she is a dirty whore who jumps on any penis within her immediate vicinity
Secondly is the person in a position of authority over undergrads (a teaching assistant) complaining that he can't hit on his students. Yes, because those sorts of relationships don't have the potential for abuse.
Thirdly we have the complaint that he can't have sex with his fellow students because he's now older, which is somewhat reasonable I guess, though most students in college are considered adults legally. However, I find it troubling he's more concerned about how it would look to sleep with his "peers," rather than focusing on his education.
All of this under a minute of time. And the sad thing is I could post even more.
