![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
There's really not much more I can add to what he's said already except to reiterate his final points:
So to everyone worrying about “misunderstandings,” you’ve got a choice. You can choose to make sure your partner enthusiastically consents to what you’re doing, or you can choose not to. Why wouldn’t you make sure? I can think of only two reasons.
- You’re uncomfortable talking about it. If that’s the case — if you’re not comfortable talking about what you’re doing — then maybe you shouldn’t be doing it?
- You’re worried they’ll say no. Meaning you’re not sure they want this, and you’d rather risk committing rape than risk asking and being told no.
The absence of the word no does not imply consent, particularly when that enthusiastic "Yes!" is missing too. Silence is not consent. A meek yes after being coerced, pressured, and/or badgered into consenting is not consent.
This is not a difficult concept to grasp, it really, really isn't, but so many people want to whine about "mixed signals" or "misunderstandings." Men, if you are at any point unclear as to whether or not she's enjoying what's going on, the onus is not on her to speak up. The onus is on you not to be a jerk and to ask her if she's fine.
Maybe later I'll open up about something that happened to me that falls under this heading, but for now all I'm asking is for people to read and to think about what's being discussed.