jadedmusings: (Default)
Here we go again.

[livejournal.com profile] fanficrants is a community that is dedicated to...well, ranting about bad fanfics. Most of the rants are along the lines of grammar snark, out-of-character Mary Sues/Gary Stus, and gemstone-colored orbs eyes. Given that it's fanfiction, there is inevitably a few rants about bad sex scenes, which per community rules are always placed behind a cut (and if they aren't, mods are quick to step in and ask the poster to place behind a cut or face deletion). This method seemed to work out really well, and FFR has been around since 2002. That is until someone flagged it as being sexually explicit and LiveJournal changed the settings on the community and labeled it as containing "explicit adult content."

It was first mentioned here by one under-eighteen member (and yes, this is the post for which I was metaquoted, so now you know what I was on about). Today, an FFR mod confirmed that LiveJournal had indeed flagged the community as adult and that there was nothing they could do about it. No chance to change their rules, no chance to delete any "offensive" material, nothing. After eight years without a problem, suddenly anyone under the age of eighteen cannot so much as view a single post in FFR.

There are so many things wrong here that I don't even know where to begin.

Read more... )

Finally, where are the parents in all of this? As a parent I fully recognize that if I don't like the material my child is viewing/reading, I can prevent him from viewing/reading it. There are a plethora of ways of protecting my child from the dangers of the internet, and as he gets older, I can stay involved with what he's doing online and informed of who he is talking to. I can make a list of rules and provide consequences for breaking those rules, which can and should include my ability to take his computer access away. It won't kill him, and if it will keep him just a little bit safer, I'll accept his anger in exchange for keeping him healthy.
jadedmusings: (Default)
[Trigger Warning]

How it is that in 2009 - almost 2010 - people still believe that it is impossible for a husband to rape his wife? No, really, being married does not mean you get to fuck your spouse whenever you want to. Both partners must consent to it, otherwise it's not sex, it's rape. Why is this so damned difficult to understand?

This entry brought to you by Jade reading the comments in [livejournal.com profile] fanficrants wherein she also learned that it's impossible for men to be raped by women as well because the man is not penetrated in that case.
jadedmusings: (Default)
I was waiting for this wank. Mmm, it is delicious. Om nom nom. But now I must rant.

Warning: Spoilers for the new Trek movie under the cut. )
jadedmusings: (Default)
[23:43:07] <JadeNSC> I hate the internet. ;-;
[23:43:14] <Remora> ?
[23:43:14] <JadeNSC> And I hate that I know it so well.
[23:43:25] <JadeNSC> OK, first of all, there's this entry to fanfic rants ([[livejournal.com profile] fanficrants]:
[23:43:34] <JadeNSC> "I could see that her cervix was pierced."
[23:43:34] <JadeNSC> No, really, you couldn't.
[23:43:41] <Remora> ... x_x
[23:44:23] <JadeNSC> My first thought before clicking on the comments? "I bet someone will link to BME and prove her wrong. I've never seen it, but something tells me it's there..." -_- Didn't even get to the bottom of page one before this: http://news.bmezine.com/2007/07/11/cervical-piercing-wow/ [NSFW or sanity]
[23:44:39] <Remora> haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha

Profile

jadedmusings: (Default)
Wrathful and Unrepentant Jade

December 2013

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 31    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios