In which I try to explain why this stuff gets under my skin.
Today, I linked to
a BoingBoing article concerning a speaker system built for mp3 players. The speakers are built into a female mannequin. You plug your mp3 player into her crotch and her breasts serve as speakers.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised at this. Melissa McEwan at Shakesville has
an entire series dedicated to the phenomena of products that resemble parts of the female anatomy. It's not like any of this is exactly new to me, but I have to admit it bothers me. It bothers me that the first reaction people have is to laugh it off, or to say, "That's creative," or even to make crass jokes ("If only I could get my wife/girlfriend/unnamed woman to do that. Hyuk, hyuk!"). It bothers me that I have to explain to people that it's not the fact that women are more "aestethically pleasing," it's that our bodies are objectified to a frightening degree. It's that it's so easy to divorce a woman's body from her humanity and that
we see nothing wrong with it.
Liss says it better than I can:
But I despair at the reactions to the post at Boing Boing, no less that it was posted there in the first place. That we have been so resoundingly inured to the narratives of female subjugation that we are expected to not care when presented with a product like this, communicating at its essence the message that women's bodies are not to be respected and are worth little beyond their value as men's entertainment, could not more pointedly underline how very far away we are from authentic equality.
You're right, I've got no sense of humor
when it comes to this. You spend a few years being bombarded with messages that say your body, and only your body, is here solely to serve as a source of pleasure for someone else and then tell me to laugh it off.